With the concept of consumption and the constant pursuit of quality of life, today’s young people’s requirements for vehicles are no longer limited to daily commuting. For them, an SUV that can not only meet daily commuting, but also has excellent intelligent driving experience and certain off-road ability is undoubtedly the most tempting choice.
In terms of bringing forth the old and bringing forth the new in diversified products, China automobile enterprises headed by China Haval have taken the lead compared with traditional joint venture brands. Take the popular car model that is very hot recently as an example. This car has positioned its products as a new traveling companion for young people, and innovatively put forward a new category scale of "3/4 scale car", which quickly became a well-deserved traffic star once it came out. Many people may wonder, compared with Toyota RAV4, a traditional joint venture SUV, do they really have the strength and joint venture in terms of product strength and process details?
Recently, in the original disassembly program "Big Bang" by the professional automobile media, we launched a frontal confrontation with Toyota RVA4. Through the complete disassembly of the vehicle, we can intuitively understand the great progress made by the domestic brands that we thought represented in recent years, and gradually gain the leading edge over the joint venture products at the same level. Among the columns, the models participating in the comparison are the Garden Dog version with a guide price of 155,900 yuan and the Toyota CVT two-wheel drive urban version with a guide price of 175,800 yuan.
After the conventional monitoring of body structure, paint thickness and scratch resistance of paint, the two cars entered the stage of disassembly and comparison. In the front part, after the front bumper is removed, a concave high-strength steel collision beam is adopted, while Toyota adopts an aluminum alloy collision beam. However, in terms of structure, Toyota’s anti-collision beam is directly installed on the longitudinal beam of the car body without the design of energy-absorbing box. Once a collision occurs, it is easy to expand, which will affect the protection effect to a certain extent.
As for the manufacturing process of the car door, Toyota’s car door adopts a two-stage welding manufacturing process, which is not only exquisite in terms of aesthetics, but also inferior in structural strength.
It is worth mentioning that the shaking of the window glass reflected by Toyota users has also been solved in this disassembly. Rongfang’s window glass uses a single guide rail elevator, and because there is only one fixed point, the window will inevitably shake to a certain extent. However, a more secure layout of double guide rail window elevator is adopted.
After further disassembly, the gap between the two cars in materials is more intuitive. For example, in the selection of sound insulation cotton in the car, the doors, the roof and the bottom of the car are all made of white fiber cotton, which is more environmentally friendly and reliable. Rongfang not only has no sound insulation cotton in the door, but also the sound insulation cotton used in other parts of the car is low-cost recycled cotton. As we all know, the sound insulation effect of recycled cotton is not as good as that of fiber cotton, but also much higher in the volatilization of harmful gases, which is extremely unfriendly to the members in the car.
In addition, in the comparison of the central control panel in the car, the 8-inch central control multimedia screen is not only 12.3 inches smaller in size. In terms of the type of central control screen, Rongfang is still a relatively old non-full-fit screen, which not only has poor visual effects, but also has poor display and touch effects. The full-fit screen is not only more sensitive to touch feedback, but also more transparent and delicate in color display and resolution.
In the subsequent comparison of body cutting and disassembly, because the two models have been tested for too long and wading, and soaked in water in the compartment, after the frame was cut, the internal structure of the B-pillar of the vehicle honored by the program group was corroded in a large area. In fact, the previous soaking test only involved the bottom of the vehicle, not the B-pillar part of the vehicle. In this regard, the analysis of the program group said that it may be because of the high concentration of water vapor remaining in the car after the water was flooded during the long test, which will lead to the corrosion of some parts of the car body that have not been rusted.
However, in fact, the white body of the vehicle should usually undergo electrophoresis, and even in a highly humid environment, there should be no large-scale corrosion. Obviously, the electrophoresis process of this disassembled Rongfang may have some problems. However, the irreversible corrosion of key structural parts such as B-pillar will affect the structural strength of the car body for a long time, and then affect the safety.
In addition to the episode of car body corrosion, compared with the glory of 2.0L two-wheel drive, the car scene is more diverse. The 2.0T engine can output the maximum power of 211 horsepower, and it is also equipped with the fifth-generation intelligent four-wheel drive system of Borgwarner and the professional off-road configuration of central electronic control differential lock and rear axle electronic control mechanical jaw differential lock.
The materials are kind, the power is strong, and it has excellent off-road configuration while taking into account the comfort of urban SUVs. It is self-evident that the two models are superior and inferior in this comparison, which is obviously more popular with young users who are more pursuing quality and life-oriented.
关于作者